LEETCODE IS DEAD. YOUR SCREEN SHOULDN'T BE.

Algorithm tests can't tell a strong engineer from one who pasted the problem into Claude. Long take-homes drive away the best candidates. OpenLevel is the technical screen that actually measures what matters now: how a candidate builds real systems with AI in the loop.

› Sits between resume review and your on-site. Replaces leetcode-style tests and outdated take-homes.

Run 3 real assessments, your candidates, your roles. No credit card, no sales call required.

system_architecture.ts SANDBOXED

  
AI grader log live
Signal
··
System architecture··
AI prompt efficiency··
Code quality··
60-minute modern task Full IDE + AI agent Every keystroke captured Intelligent scoring Sandboxed per candidate Async or live review Built for the AI era Replaces leetcode + take-homes 60-minute modern task Full IDE + AI agent Every keystroke captured Intelligent scoring Sandboxed per candidate Async or live review Built for the AI era Replaces leetcode + take-homes
Chapter 01
01

What's broken.

The problem

Your technical screen was built for a pre-AI world.

Every candidate has Claude. Every algorithm test is now a test of who has access to AI, not who can build. The screen that should be filtering signal is filtering nothing.

01
WASTE

Wasted engineer screen time

Every false positive that passes the screen costs your engineers an hour of on-site time on someone who can't actually build. The screen is supposed to protect that time. It isn't.

"The candidate passed our screen but couldn't actually build with AI, they could prompt for snippets, not architect a real system."
02
WRONG SIGNAL

Algorithm tests test the wrong thing

Any candidate with Claude can solve a 'hard' algorithm problem in minutes. You're no longer testing engineering skill, you're testing who knows how to paste a prompt.

"Our hardest LeetCode question, solved in 4 minutes. By every candidate."
03
DROP-OFF

Candidates ghost the take-home

The best engineers have 5 to 10 offers. Long, poorly-designed take-homes are why they drop out before your on-site. Your screen is filtering out exactly the people you most want.

"Senior candidates: 38% drop-off. We were losing them to the screen, not the offer."
04
LOSING BATTLE

The cheating arms race

Proctoring tools frustrate the engineers you want to hire and lose the battle anyway. Every cheating workaround is one prompt away. You can't out-detect AI, you have to redesign the test.

"Multiple cheating candidates passed our screen, you can't catch everyone. The only fix is a test where there's no reason to cheat in the first place."
0%
False positives
of screens passed candidates who failed on-site coding.
0hr
Engineer time
lost per bad on-site, multiplied across every false positive.
0%
Drop-off
of senior candidates abandoning take-homes before submission.
0 prompt
Arms race
is all it takes to solve current coding assessments.
Chapter 02
02

What we built instead.

The solution

A technical screen built for engineers who already work with AI.

OpenLevel measures judgment under AI leverage, how a candidate orchestrates the model, makes architectural calls, and ships real working software in 60 minutes.

/01

Real work, real ambiguity

Candidates get a full IDE, AI agent, and a task with deliberate product ambiguity. They decide what to build, not just how.

// task brief
Build a rate-limited distributed cache
with graceful failover. The spec is
intentionally incomplete, you decide.
No multiple-choice. No leetcode. Just engineering.
/02

Judgment under AI leverage

We measure how they orchestrate the AI, prompt quality, architectural choices, when they push back on the model.

prompts ratio: directed / total = 0.84
pushed back on AI: 3 times
generation : verification
1.0 : 1.4
The new signal: orchestration, not generation.
/03

Every decision captured

Keystrokes, prompts, file changes, terminal commands. See how a candidate thinks, not just what shipped.

14:02 · edit circuit.ts +18
14:04 · prompt "should I retry or fail?"
14:06 · delete agent-suggested code
14:07 · write own implementation
Full session replay. The audit trail comes with it.
/04

Human judgment, kept in the loop

Signal, not verdict. Optional live code review surfaces the smart questions; your engineers make the call.

// suggested probing question
"Walk through your trade-off when
the agent proposed cache-aside,
why did you push back?"
Async by default. Live when you want a deeper read.
01 / 04

The old screen

  • ×Algorithm puzzles every candidate solves with Claude in 2 minutes
  • ×5-hour take-homes the best engineers refuse to do
  • ×Proctoring theater that frustrates real candidates and loses to cheaters anyway
  • ×Binary pass/fail with no signal on how they actually think

OpenLevel

  • Real systems work with deliberate ambiguity, judgment is the test
  • 60-minute modern task. No homework, no candidate drop-off
  • No proctoring. We grade how they use AI, not whether they do
  • Calibrated scoring, 70 to 80 pass, 80+ exceptional. Audit trail included
Chapter 03
03

Two ways in.

Two ways in

Try it yourself, or talk to us.

Whatever you prefer. Get hands-on with the product today, or have us walk your team through it on a call.

Try it right away

Send 3 real assessments. See the signal yourself.

Sign up free, pick a stock assessment, and invite up to 3 candidates. You'll see the scoring, the session replay, and the AI grader report on your own candidates, in under an hour.

  • 3 credits, no credit card, no sales call.
  • First invite in ~2 minutes. Credit debited only when a candidate starts.
  • Results stay accessible after the trial, even if you don't upgrade.
Talk to us first

Book a demo. We'll show you how to hire better.

Want a deeper read before you trial? A 30-minute walkthrough with our team, tailored to the roles you're hiring, the volume you're running, and the rigor your org needs from the screen.

  • Tailored to your stack, your roles, and your current screen.
  • We'll show you the methodology, scoring calibration, and audit trail.
  • Best fit for scaling orgs or anyone standardizing across teams.
Chapter 04
04

How it works.

How it works

From invite to hiring decision, in days not weeks.

Sign up, send a real assessment, and read the AI grader report in under an hour. Your engineers stay in the loop with optional live review, or skip it entirely and stay async.

01 / 07 Sign up
app.openlevel.ai/welcome FREE TRIAL
3 CREDITS / 3 ASSESSMENTS

Welcome, pick how to start

DEFAULT
Send a stock assessment
Pre-built · backend, frontend, full-stack
CUSTOM
Build a custom one
Author your own task in ~15 min
credit debited only when a candidate starts
invitations / new
Backend · Distributed cache w/ failover 60min
PIN: 7F · 2K · 9Q  ·  Language: TypeScript
Send invite
candidate-sandbox / cache.ts 60:00
📁 src
cache.ts
circuit.ts •
index.ts
📁 tests
cache.spec.ts
◆ AI agent ready
  1  export class DistributedCache {
  2    private breaker: CircuitBreaker;
  3
  4    async getOrSet<T>(key: string,
  5                      fn: () => Promise<T>) {
  6      if (await this.breaker.isOpen())
  7        return fn();
  8      // graceful fallback
  9      const hit = await this.redis.get(key);
 10    }
 11  }
ask agent: how should I handle a redis timeout here?
AI grader · run #4821 live
14:02Parsing file diffs + prompt history…
14:03Identified circuit breaker pattern. Architectural choice: ✓
14:04Prompt analysis: orchestration, not generation.
14:05Edge case coverage: 4/5, missed cold-start.
14:06Computing signal score
14:06Verdict: Strong Hire · 86 / 100
candidates / maya.chen / report PASSED
SIGNAL · BACKEND
86
vs. team median 71
Strong Hire
System architecture88
AI prompt efficiency92
Code quality78
Test coverage80
70 TO 80 PASS 80+ EXCEPTIONAL
live review · suggested questions OPTIONAL
Q.01 Why a circuit breaker over a simple retry-with-backoff?
Q.02 What changes if redis is partitioned, not down?
Q.03 Walk through your trade-off when the agent suggested cache-aside.
Q.04 If we 10x the read load, where does this break first?
generated from THIS candidate's submission. Skip live · stay async.
decision · maya.chen
No Hire
Lean No
Lean Hire
Strong Hire
NOTES
Strong on system design, especially failure modes. Prompts were directed, never copy-paste. Advance to on-site, skip the architecture screen.
Decision logged · added to team calibration history (47 assessments)
Features

Everything you need to run a real AI-era screen.

No proctoring theater. No five-hour homework. Just the toolkit purpose-built for evaluating engineers who already ship with AI.

SECURITY

Sandboxed, isolated per candidate

Each candidate gets their own ephemeral environment. No shared state, no exfiltration path, no way to peek at past submissions.

SCORING

Intelligent scoring with calibrated thresholds

70 to 80 passes to the next round. 80+ is exceptional. Every score comes with a methodology trail your engineers can defend.

FORMAT

60-minute tasks

Modern tooling. Real ambiguity. No 5-hour homework.

SIGNAL

AI Prompt Intelligence

How they orchestrate the agent, separate signal from generation.

REPLAY

Full session capture

Keystrokes, prompts, file changes, terminal, every decision visible.

WORKFLOW

Async by default, live when you want it

Your engineers stay in the loop, we surface smart probing questions from the submission. Skip live review when async is enough.

OPS

Built-in test suite + audit trail

Automated tests run alongside the AI grader. Structured reports your Head of Talent can hand to legal without a phone call.

Free trial

Three credits. Three real assessments. No card.

A self-serve path for SMB teams and anyone who'd rather try the screen than sit through a sales call. Demo stays available for the bigger orgs.

STEP 1

Sign up

Email + password or Google SSO. ~30 seconds. No company-size form, no sales call.

STEP 2

Choose an assessment

Pick a stock assessment, backend, frontend, full-stack, or build your own in ~15 minutes.

STEP 3

Invite the candidate

Single field: candidate email + assessment. Credit debited only when they start.

−1 CREDIT
STEP 4

They take the assessment

Candidate works in a real IDE with an AI agent for 60 minutes. Every decision captured.

STEP 5

See the result, decide

AI grading report ready in minutes. You decide: advance, decline, or live review.

No credit card No sales call required Results stay accessible after trial
Start free Book a demo
FAQ

Questions, answered.

How is this different from HackerRank, CoderPad, or legacy assessment tools? +

Those tools were built for a pre-AI world. Algorithm tests no longer separate signal from noise when every candidate has Claude. OpenLevel was built for the world where every engineer ships with an AI agent, we measure how they use it, not whether they can avoid it.

Where does OpenLevel fit in our existing hiring process? +

Between resume review and your on-site. We replace your current technical screen, take-home or automated coding test, and hand off a ranked, scored shortlist to your team. Sourcing, interviewing, and offers stay with you.

What if my engineers don't have time for live reviews? +

Live review is optional. You can ship an entirely async workflow: candidate completes the assessment, AI grader scores it, your team reviews the report and decides whether to advance. Live review is there when you want a deeper read, not required.

How does the free trial work? +

Three credits, three real assessments, stock or custom. No card. A credit is debited only when a candidate starts. After three, choose a plan or keep your results read-only.

What happens after the trial? +

Results and dashboard stay accessible. To invite more candidates, pick a plan, Starter for one-offs ($35), Launchpad for ongoing hiring ($99/mo).

Can candidates use AI tools during the assessment? +

Yes, that's the point. OpenLevel is built for AI-era workflows, and candidates are expected to use AI. We evaluate how effectively they orchestrate it.

Who is OpenLevel for? +

Engineering teams hiring software engineers who will work alongside AI tools day-to-day. From early-stage startups running 3 assessments a month to scaling orgs standardizing the screen across the org.

The new screen

Stop screening for test-takers.
Start screening for engineers.

Three credits, three assessments, no card. See the signal yourself, then decide.

No credit card · no sales call · ~ 2 minutes to your first invite
Book a demo

Tell us a bit about your team.

A 30-minute walkthrough, tailored to your hiring workflow. We'll show you the candidate experience, the grading reports, and how to read the signal. No prep needed.

  • Tailored to your stack and the roles you're hiring
  • See methodology, scoring calibration, and the audit trail
  • No commitment, leave with a trial account if you want one

Prefer to just try it? Skip to free trial instead.

We'll be in touch in < 24 hours.